This is a joint note with Prof. Charan Singh, IIM B
The vital signs have emerged but
if care is not taken then risks may reappear and global financial crisis could
morph deeper into a coma or a more chronic phase, warned the IMF in its latest
Global Financial Stability Report released on April 17 at Washington DC. Though
the Report opens with the statement that the global financial stability has
improved in the last six months, the reading of Chapter 1 gives the perception
that vital organs are still infected.
The Report mentions some
persistent and old risks which are a legacy of the crisis. These are in the
Euro area and mainly in the periphery – small and medium companies are
suffering on account of inadequate flow of credit and the corporate sector is
facing a large debt overhang. The Report assesses the effects of high corporate
leverage on debt servicing and debt repayment capacity over the medium term and
concludes that it needs continued vigilance by supervisors. Five years after
the start of the crisis, banking systems are still in different stages of
balance sheet repair with the Euro area requiring significant adjustments where
banks remain weak with low buffers, deteriorating asset quality and poor
profitability. The medium term prospects seem bleak. The new risks, mainly in the US and euro area, are associated
with weakening of the underwriting standards of corporate debt; further risk
taking by pension funds and insurance companies, in view of ultra-low interest
rates; increased borrowings by emerging market corporates in international
markets exposing them to foreign currency risks; and finally, eventual
unwinding of prolonged monetary easing by the US.
The emerging markets have been
performing well but some deterioration in asset quality has begun to appear in
countries like Brazil, India and Mexico. Asset restructuring by the financial
institutions in China and India also needs to be carefully assessed, according
to the IMF. The emerging markets have also been advised to stay alert to the
risks stemming from increased cross-border capital flows. In view of the low
interest rates and high risk appetite in advanced countries, there is a
possibility that too much money chasing too few emerging market assets, says
the IMF. Alas, the recognition of the fact, long advocated by India at the IMF
board, that easy monetary policy in advanced countries spills over to the
emerging countries and causes asset appreciation is finally being recognized by
the IMF. Another related aspect which has been so elegantly articulated in the
Report was the need for some emerging countries, in the face of the
appreciation pressure from increased inflows, to opt for looser monetary policy
than they would otherwise have done for fear of becoming major carry trade
destination.
In any war, since the times of
Mahabharata, a good army general plans an exit before launching an attack. Well,
better late than never, the focus of Chapter 3 titled Do Central Bank Policies since the Crisis carry risks to Financial
Stability is mainly on exit policies that central banks need to consider.
The chapter, sort of an extension of Chapter 1, discusses the unconventional
monetary policies, called MP-plus in the chapter, followed by four major
central banks – Fed Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan and Bank of
England. It identifies possible risks to domestic financial stability and to
the financial health of banks. The MP-plus has been useful in the short run but
has had some side-effects. The Report recognizes that longer the MP-plus
remains in place, a number of future risks are likely to increase, including
heightened credit risks for banks, delays in balance sheet repairs,
difficulties in restarting private interbank funding markets and challenges in
exiting from markets in which central banks have intervened. MP-plus refers to policy measures like
prolonged periods of very low interest rates, quantitative easing involving
direct purchases of government bonds, indirect credit easing providing long
term liquidity to banks and direct credit easing whereby central banks directly
intervene in credit markets. These operations have changed the size and
composition of the balance sheet of the central banks. The risks in the exit
strategy, associated with rising interest rates and sale of assets in the
balance sheet of central banks would impact banks, financial institutions, and
markets. Hence, the IMF provides advice to policy makers to use macro-prudential
toolkit to mitigate risks and strengthen supervision of the financial sector
during the exit phase.
The remedial prescriptions in the
GFSR would seem familiar to Indians, who firmly believe that precaution is
better than cure. While the world is busy in getting rid of the malady, cautious
approach of the policy makers in India, including that of the RBI, needs to be
recognized. It would have been interesting if the measures initiated during
this time by a central bank on the other side of the spectrum, illustratively
an emerging market like India, would also have been analysed in GFSR.