Monday, August 19, 2019

Policy Response to Growth Slowdown 2019



Q 1. What is the real Economic Growth likely to be in 2019-20? Is there a trend decline or structural slowdown in GDP growth?
Answer 1:  GDP growth is likely to be 6.5% +/- 0.5% in 2019-20. This is a trend decline from the 7.5%+/-0.5% growth trajectory which prevailed earlier. It can be higher (7%+/-0.5%) in 2020-21, if there are sufficient policy reforms to put it back on an upward trajectory!

Q 2 What are the underlying Reasons for this slow-down?
Answer 2: The underlying structural reasons for the slowdown are,
(i)                  A Creeping hollowing out of the credit system driven by Government misuse of Public Sector Banks & political interference in Money-credit system: The termite ridden structure collapsed when tighter regulatory & reporting norms were imposed on banks and deposit taking NBFCs, and Indian Bankruptcy Code was approved and implemented, ending irresponsible lending by banks and irresponsible borrowing by firms.  The entire legacy costs have unfortunately to be borne by the post IBC economy.
(ii)                Dysfunctional Policies for Crop Agriculture: Wheat-Sugar-Rice agriculture has reached a Dead-end, as have half century old policies to promote & protect it. Vested interests & ignorant policy makers (Agriculture is a State subject) refuse to abandon the failed paradigm and try a new policy framework which has succeeded in many countries!
(iii)              Economic Damage from (Moral) Success in Reduction of black money. The collateral economic damage from, (a) Black money Crusade, consisting of a series of anti-black money laws, rules and actions culminating in big bang demonetization, and (b) An un-necessarily complex GST, which led to very low buy-in by informal trade & SSIs. Together these have reduced demand from informal sector significantly.
(iv)              Loss of Credibility of Union Govt with respect to growth enhancing policy reforms. One key element of this is ad hoc increases in Cesses, surcharges, sources of income(e.g. Capital gains), marginal Income tax rates and Import Tariffs, unconnected with tax economics (e.g. Direct Tax Code), combined with an excruciatingly slow pace of fulfillment of promises on Corporate tax reform(rate reduction).

Q3. What is the inflation rate likely to be, that will ultimately impact the real GDP growth rate?
Answer 3: The Global problem is no longer high inflation, but the opposite. World is likely entering another deflationary phase, which won't be as bad as the post Global Financial (2008) deflation, but needs to be recognized & accounted for in policy formulation.

Q4.  Is there a cyclical downturn in demand.  Should fiscal consolidation be forgotten, so as to stimulate effective Demand.
Answer 4: To the extent there is cyclical reduction in aggregate demand, a slowdown in GDP growth will reduce tax collections and act as a natural stabilizer. As far as deliberate relaxation of fiscal deficit targets is concerned the impact depends whether its due to Revenue or Capital Expenditure or due to new Tax Incentives or temporary tax reductions associated with tax Reforms. The impact of fiscal deficits on economy is very different coming from different sources. Higher Fiscal deficits to disguise Govt inefficiency and waste are unacceptable as they constrain monetary policy.
  Regulatory changes such as the shift from BS 4 to BS6 norms effective April 2020 and more stringent safety, insurance and other norms seems to have led to an increase in costs and a reduction in demand for cars & other automobiles.[i] Because automobile sector is such an important part of the industrial sector, a short term reduction in GST (till march 2020) on the most severely affected segments of the auto industry can, however be considered.    

Q 5.  What should the Government do about public expenditure What should be done towards rationalizing Centrally Sponsored Schemes?
Answer 5: The negative effects of any increase in revenue expenditure will have a negative effect on economy by constraining MPC’s speed of Repo rate reduction. At this point of time there is no obvious gains from increased capital expenditure and much more from reviving Private-Public Partnership Model through reform of the PP framework to bring in more capital with the same amount of public expenditure.  There is also a need for a drastic reduction in the Centrally Sponsored Schemes relating to Concurrent and State lists of the Constitution to a maximum of one scheme per Sector. Any CSS in State list should be focused on incentivizing reform & modernization, for instance reform of the technology & management systems of the Police (e.g. Forensic labs) & courts/judiciary.

Q 6. What is the direct tax reform agenda?
Answer 6: Propose new Direct Tax Code in next budget, put a draft out for public discussion as soon as possible, Corporate Income tax - reduce to 25% in next budget and to 20-22% in subsequent 3 budgets.

Q 7. What is the path ahead for GST?
Answer 7: Target a Three Tier system by April 2022, The lowest tier of exempt Goods & services is largely in place. The highest tier of surcharges is also in place, but the number of goods and service within it should be limited to 6-9. The Middle tier should work towards a single standard rate applicable to non-exempt Goods & services, perhaps with an intermediate 2-3 rates.

Q 8. Specifically, what should be done to trigger genuine privatization of Central Public Sector Enterprises?
Answer 8: Sell all loss making CPSEs: There are two critical elements. Value of Land with & without land use restriction in lease/sale dead. The Legacy cost of excess, unproductive labor. Public acceptability depends on careful handling of these issues wherever present.

Q 9. What can the Government do to stimulate exports? Are there any specific suggestions on exchange rate management?
Answer 9: Ease of doing Business for Cross border trade has not improved significantly and must receive urgent attention.  The Coastal Export/Employment Zones (CEZs) and a few (6 say) large Special Export/Employment Zones in the non-Coastal States, must be provided with laws (incl labor), rules & procedures which are competitive with China/Vietnam.  Exim-policy, import tariffs and export duties on agricultural require integrated reform.  Specific duties on Textiles imports need to be converted to Ad valorem (%) to eliminate evasion & corruption, a Tariff Reform Committee should be appointed to propose a rational policy for tariffs.
   REER is important for exporters in a 3-year horizon. Relative GDP growth and relative productivity growth play an important role in this context. In the short to medium time horizon (<3 years), Volatility is more important for exporters & importers, and monetary policy (Relative real interest rates and Base Money growth), plays an important role in stabilization.

Q 10. What should be the role of Monetary Policy? Any specific suggestions on more efficient transmission of Repo Rate to Exchange Rate?
Answer 10: As long as inflation is firmly on 4% target, Repo rate should be (reduced to) 4% (real 0%).  Base money growth must be maintained at a rate necessary to create a long-term liquidity surplus, to aid transmission. Small saving rates must be linked to market rates in Govt securities.
     RBI should mandate a RBI supervised re-rating of NBFCs and help in removing Systemic risk(along with govt). Ratings should be made public to improve market transparency & market based resolution of remaining issues, after eliminating systemic risk.

Q 11. Should the inflation targeting band of 4% +/- 2% be reviewed? Should we co-define and target core inflation along with this band?
Answer 11: NO. Govt created regulatory uncertainty must be minimized. The risk of greater uncertainty far out-weigh any potential gains from this.

Q12. What other steps are required to boost a) Private Consumption, b) Investment?
Answer 12:  Rural-Urban economy plus [ii]
a) Comprehensive Agricultural Market Liberalization (+R&D, e-extension),
b) Basic Education (quality, outcomes) and Job Skills [Low(agriculture, industry), Middle(services), High (modern manufacturing & services)]. Reform apprenticeship act to promote job related training.
c) Labor simplification & flexibility, Portability of & competitiveness in, PSI, PF & social welfare systems.
d) Land market liberalization: land use flexibility, particularly in rural areas (e.g. Corporate agriculture in wasteland, conversion of agricultural land to industrial estates), Encourage land pooling for development.
e) Accelerate Digital India(connectivity) Personal Data ownership/protection law!
(e) Complete FDI liberalization process



[i] The chairmen of Maruti reported on CNBC TV18 interview that costs may have increased by 10-13% on different types of cars.
[ii] See also, Virmani, Arvind, “Policy Reforms for Reversing Slowdown and Accelerating GDP growth,” https://egrowfoundation.org/research/policy-reforms-for-reversing-slowdown-and-accelerating-gdp-growth/

Saturday, October 13, 2018

China: Tariff war, Debt bubble, Over investment & Growth.


Q1: The IMF has downgraded China's economic growth by 0.2 percentage points to 6.2% for the (calendar) year 2019. Meanwhile, you have predicted China's growth could slip to below 5%. When do you expect this to happen?
A1: All official forecasts, including IMF, World Bank, ADB, relate to official country data. My forecast of a decline in China's GDP growth rate to 4.5% to 5.5% , relates to the real (underlying)GDP growth rates. The gap between official & real rates in China is likely to rise sharply next year and then close slowly. This official data may only reflect the full extent of real growth slowdown in about 3 years i.e. 2021!

Q2: How will China's growth slowdown impact the rest of the world? What will be the impact on the Indian economy?
A2: We must distinguish the immediate short term (ST) impact from the medium & long term one (MLT). The ST effect will be to slow China’s export growth and Imports linked to it i.e. natural resources from developing countries, capital goods from developed countries & intermediate inputs from Asian supply chains. Therefore, GDP growth in these countries may be adversely affected in short term. In MLT a slowing of Chinese growth and investment in manufacturing & other tradable goods will reduce excess global capacity in tradable goods. This will increase profitability in manufacturing, investment & GDP growth in India and other competing countries.

Q3: You have pointed out that China's growth will be impacted by the tariff war and domestic credit bubble. Can you quantify the impact of these two factors?
A3: The USA is the largest market for China’s exports. A rise in US tariffs on imports from China has both a direct effect on its exports and an indirect effect on FDI investment in supply chains located in China. Together these could reduce China’s growth by 0.75% to 1.25%, if higher US tariffs are maintained. Exit from the debt-credit bubble would reduce growth by 0.5% to 1%. These supply chains will relocate out of China over next year or two, increasing FDI & investment in competing countries in Asia, and increase exports from & GDP of these countries.

Q4: Tariff war is largely being pushed by President Trump. If the restrictions do not escalate into a war, is the Chinese economy still at risk?
A4: The effect of an additional (above rates for others) 25% US import tariff on all imports from China, if sustained for 3 to 5 years will result in a deceleration of China's GDP growth. The measures directed at preventing forced transfer of technology and theft of technology from US companies will continue in parallel and ensure that, reverse engineered US R&D cannot be passed off as innovation.

Q5: How bad is the domestic credit bubble in China? Can the country manage a soft landing?
A5: The Chinese economy has seen among the largest increase in debt among the systemically important economies (US, Euro Area, Japan, UK, India), since the Global Financial crises(40% of total global debt increase). An earlier debt-credit bubble burst in 2015 & a new one was initiated in 2016, but channeled a little more through the fisc and combined with a tightening of capital controls on residents/citizens. Increased external & internal controls make it easier to ensure a financial soft landing. They do not ensure a soft landing in terms of real Economic growth.

Q6: How can China maintain its growth momentum in a de-globalized world
A6: The massive increase in World Trade ended with the Global Financial Crisis. China which benefited hugely from this globalization, has avoided the severe consequences of this reversal of globalization by increasing its share of global import and by pumping credit into its economy. These measures have kept its growth from falling below 6.5%. The US tariffs on China mean that countries which have lost because of the mercantilist growth model followed by the communist party of China are no longer willing to accept these costs. Similarly credit fueled growth cannot be sustained indefinitely. Thus, a decline in China's GDP growth rate is inevitable. The only question is when and how smoothly? China can smoothen the adjustment to a lower growth rate by allowing wages to rise to level consistent with its Per Capita GDP & eliminating directed lending to unprofitable SOEs, Exporters, Party capitalists and high risk, low return investments.

Q7: You have talked about the opportunities for India from the US-China tariff war. What are they?
A7: From the start of the US-China tariff war, late last year-early this year I have emphasized the huge opportunity for India to attract supply chains located in China to India. The new US approach to China's communist party run non-market, non-transparent economy creates great uncertainty for export-oriented supply chains located in China. Given India's free market, open democratic system the Indian economy provides a stable long-term location for such investment. This is particularly so for labour intensive products & processes and where cyber security is a concern as in electronics, telecom & electrical control systems. However, we need to get our own policies and institutions in order. The EoDB external indicator is still very poor. Complaints of tax terrorism are still heard from foreign companies. We need to drastically simplify bureaucratic procedures for FDI & other Export production.

Q8: There is talk of decoupling or disentangling of the US and Chinese economy, what are your views?
A8: There is very high likelihood of a decoupling of the US and Chinese economies over the next 10 years. This will affect significant effects on Geo-economics and Geopolitics. We must be prepared to grab the opportunities this will throw up while remaining alert to the dangers.

To read more,
 "Effect of China Slowdown on India", Policy Paper No. WsPP 1/2017, April 2017, ChinaIndia17feb20Apr.docx .



--------------------------------------------