Showing posts with label Subsidies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Subsidies. Show all posts

Monday, March 7, 2016

Economic Growth and Macro Stability: Budget 2016-17


Introduction

   Sustained fast growth of the economy requires a stable macro-economic framework,  policies that stimulate growth and institutions(including laws & rules) that support competitive self sustaining job creating business and promote employment opportunities. Though India's GDP growth rate has risen gradually to 7.6% in 2015-16 (estimated), parts of the economy are buffeted by global growth deceleration, capital market uncertainty and deflationary pressures. These have reduced nominal growth to 8.6% and put pressure on the globalised corporate sector, reducing the nominal growth rates of their sales and profits. The rural economy has been weakened by two consecutive droughts, the first such dual drought since the end 1990s.  In this note we review the budget to identify, what if anything the budget proposes to do about these issues.

Fiscal Balance

   The 2016-17 budget implicitly recognizes that a growth rate of 7.5% to 7.75% doesn't require an expansion of government expenditure or wide tax incentives, by sticking to the fiscal deficit (FD) target of 3.5% of GDP for next year. Such a panicked reaction that will haunt us for the next decade. The decision to stick to fiscal targets enhances the credibility of the government, reduces the risk of contagion from World turmoil & sudden stops in capital flows and lays the basis for a reduction in policy interest rates by the RBI. A reduction in the interest rate by 50 BPS will considerably ease the stress felt by the corporate sector by stimulating demand for consumer durables, including housing and automobiles. The proposed amendment of the RBI Act to create a Monetary Policy Committee will formalize flexible inflation targeting, enhance the credibility of the RBI and allow better Monetary-Fiscal policy balance. 

Subsidies & Investment

    When the fiscal deficit target for 2015-16 was loosened to accommodate more infrastructure investment by government. The question in our minds was whether the government would be able to shifting expenditure from consumption cum subsidies to investment. The fact that the Revenue deficit(RD) for 2015-16 is 0.3% point below the revised target suggests that it has successfully achieved an improvement in quality of government expenditures. As the revenue deficit is a rough measure of government dis-saving, this will help raise national savings and reduce dependence on foreign savings. The RD is projected to decline by only 0,2% point of GDP in 2016-17 compared to the 0.4% of GDP reduction in FD. This is partly due to wage pressures arising from pay commission report implementation, however the budget could have done much more on reform of the fertilizer, food and kerosene subsidy.  In the longer term the proposed bill to provide statutory backing to use of Aadhar for providing targeted benefits, will greatly improve the efficiency of subsidy expenditure and reduce leakages & corruption.
The adoption of Kelkar committee recommendations on Private-Public Partnership would also help in completing stalled projects and promote new PPP projects by reducing regulatory uncertainty. Among the proposals in the budget are, one a Public Utility Dispute resolution Bill, Guidelines for PPP re-negotiations if the external environment changes unpredictably and a Credit rating system for infrastructure taking account of special risks involved. 

Policy Initiatives

  There are a few notable policy initiatives in budget that will help improve the competitiveness of the economy, promote productivity and generate employment. The budget speech proposes to allow 100% FDI in food processing. Along with the previously proposed setting up of a National e-market in agricultural produce could be a game changer for agricultural marketing . For decades we have talked about the huge wastage of food because of lack of farm to market linkages and marketing. Recommendations of many weighty commissions have been received and implemented by Govt without much success. This is the only thing which has not been tried in India, though it has worked in other countries. According the FM 12 States have already amended their APMCs to allow them to join the E-marketing platform to be inaugurated in April 2016. This will set the stage for the FDI in marketing.
   The other measures announced in the budget, should tide the agriculture sector till the next monsoon, which is expected to be normal. The year following the last two consecutive droughts in the late 1980s, saw a jump of 16.7% in agriculture production. With a normal monsoon in 2016-17, we estimate an agricultural growth rate of 7% to 9%. The reform measures proposed in the last two years will help restore rural income, consumption & depleted savings.
The second significant reform is the proposed change in the Motor Vehicles Act to open up the passenger transport sector. Road transport falls in the concurrent list of the constitution but passenger transport has been declared a monopoly of the State Govts in most State. The proposed bill will allow private road transport companies to compete in States which adopt this change. This would allow a modernization of the sector, improving productivity and generating higher quality jobs.
The third significant reform proposal is a model law amending the Shops an Establishment to provide greater flexibility in operation to small establishments, subject to undiluted health & safety requirements. This will provide them with greater freedom and flexibility to compete with malls and other large establishment. This law too would require States to adopt it. The basic approach is to promote inter State competition in reforming laws and rules to promote employment.

Financial Sector

FM reiterated his intention to carry forward the financial reforms, such as Bankruptcy law (for non-financial companies) and proposed some new initiatives for financial firms and banks. The most significant long term reform was a Financial Firms Resolution bill. A number of changes were also announced regarding FDI in and taxation of Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs), DRTs, and Public Sector Banks which will expedite solution of the bad debt problem.

Conclusion

    There are were a number of small changes in the personal income tax, corporate tax, customs and excise duties. Some of these will help simplify the tax system while others will complicate the tax system. The net effect is a bit difficult to determine at this point. The budget also carried forward the effort to improve the system of tax administration and dispute resolution based on the recommendations of two tax administration reform committees. But the proof of the pudding in bureaucracy is always in the eating. Overall, the fiscal consolidation and reforms highlighted above make this good budget.
    I expect GDP growth to accelerate by about 0.2% points from the growth rate for 2015-16, and to be much better distributed across sectors & segments of the economy. In particular, rural economy will do much better,  with normal economy, I project an agricultural growth rate of 7% to 9%, based on past performance after two consecutive drought in late 1980s. The corporate sector is also likely to revive with a better mix of monetary-fiscal policy and improvement in the quality of the fisc with a shift from consumption-subsidies to infrastructure investment.
 
----------
 A version of this article appeared in the Indian Express of March 3rd, 2016, under the banne, "Race To The Top," at http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/union-budget-2016-race-to-the-top/ .

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Budget 2016-17; Macro highlights



Introduction

   India's real economic growth  is projected by CSO at 7.6% for 2015-16.  This is a respectable growth rate, despite two specific sectors that do not appear to share this prosperity. The agriculture sector is clearly distressed given two contiguous drought years. The other sector that hasn't seen the increase in growth anticipated two years ago. The excess capacity and deflationary conditions in the global metals and commodity is a major reason for this low growth.  The global growth slowdown and heightened risks in the global environment form a critical background for the budget

Fiscal Consolidation

   The most important and critical part of the budget is the fiscal balance. Despite suggestions  by many economists,  business men and corporates to let the fiscal targets slip for another year to finance higher  government infrastructure investment in 2016-17, the FM has rightly decided to stick to the 3.5% of GDP, fiscal deficit targets for 2016-17, outlined in the 2015-16 budget.  This will also bring the Primary deficit down to 0.3% of GDP in 2016-17. This is the best insurance against heightened global uncertainty.  The pleasant surprise is that the Revised estimate(RE) for Revenue deficit is 0.3% point lower than projected in the BE for 2015-16. The revenue deficit is an approximate measure of the dis-saving of the Government.  A reduction in this deficit adds to National savings and thus provides the most effective way of raising the National saving rate and reducing dependence on foreign savings.

Subsidy

   The most important subsidy reform in the budget is the decision to introduce a bill to give statutory backing to the use of Aadhar for providing benefits, transfers and subsidies to the targeted population of the poor and needy. This disconnects the general problems of secrecy & confidentiality and connects it to the governments duty to ensure that government's social expenditures reach the intended beneficiaries without being lost in administrative waste or corruption. A few small administrative steps are also being taken to reform the subsidy system. One is the program to provide LPG to BPL women so as to eliminate the health hazards of wood fueled open Chulahs. The second is a proposed test in a few districts  of a shift in provision of fertilizer subsidy from the current wasteful approach to a Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) system successfully tried in LPG. Reform of the food procurement continues to make very slow progress through greater use of online & digital technologies. Disappointingly there was no mention of reform of the kerosene subsidy based on the previously started  DBT experiment.

Infrastructure Investment

    The budget also remains firmly on track with the infrastructure investment programs announced in the last two budgets and in the interim periods. This includes roads, electricity, ports, waterways,  airstrips and digital connectivity. To this has been added a greater emphasis on irrigation and on infrastructure connecting rural areas to State highways. The attempt to provide an integrated program for development of agriculture and rural areas has attracted more focused attention to irrigation & other inputs and processing of agri products. There also three proposals related to PPPs: A Public Utility Resolution of Disputes Bill, Guidelines for PP renegotiations and Credit rating system for Infra projects, which will help in resolving legacy issues while imparting greater regulatory clarity to bidding for new projects.

Tax Reform

        The picture on the tax reform front also remains mixed as in the last budget. Budget takes the first steps to reform the Corporate Income tax, by giving notice of phasing out of some exemptions and lowering the tax rate for new manufacturing firms that opt out of use of remaining exemptions to 25%. There is also a commendable effort to expand the presumptive tax effort including to professionals. However there are also a number of small tax changes that are an irritant to tax payers and slow progress on simplifying tax administration, even though the intent is reflected in adoption/acceptance of Administrative Reform Committee & Justice Eswar committee recommendations.  Numerous changes in excise and customs duty also suggest a move back from simplification to industry specific (dis)incentives.

Policy Reform

    Policy reforms are essential for sustained fast growth. There are three or four  policy reforms that are noteworthy. One is a reform of the Motor Vehicles Act to open the passenger bus transport service sector to private competition. So far this sector has been a monopoly of the State Govts. The proposed reforms will allow private sectors and even State companies from other States to provide bus transport service. This will be a model law which can be adopted by the States.  The second reform is the permission of 100% FDI in the Food Processing sector, for processing and storage of Indian agricultural produce and manufactures based on these products. This is a very important opening, that one has recommended for many years, after trying many other schemes without achieving the desired result of reducing the wastage of Indian grown agricultural produce. The third important reform is the Financial Firms resolution Bill, and related reforms of ARCs plus the amendment of the RBI Act to formally set up a Monetary Policy Committee (MPC). Even though this has been expected, the formalization of monetry policy system in the RBI Act will enhance the global credibility of the monetary system.
Over all it was a good budget, because of the fiscal consolidation and the policy reforms discussed above.
-------------------------
An version of this note appeared in the Economic Times, under the Banner, "Fiscal Balance best Insurance against global knocks," on  March 1, 2016 at,
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/budget-2016-fiscal-balance-best-insurance-against-global-knocks-says-ficci-mentor-arvind-virmani/articleshow/51201750.cms

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Economic Survey 2015-16: Some Issues



Growth and Jobs

Q1: The survey pegs GDP growth at 7-7.75 per cent for the coming year, which is broadly in the range of 7.6 per cent expected in the current financial year. Do you think the Survey is conservative this time, after overestimating growth in the past many years?
A1: The mid-term review late in 2015, put the estimate of growth rate for 2015-16 at 7 to 7.5%. This means that the Economic Survey predicts a rise of 0.25% points at the top end. My own forecast of growth is an acceleration of about 0.2% points in 2016-17 over the growth rate that we get for full year 2015-16 (which is projected by CSO at 7.6%).
Q2: Do you agree with the survey observation that -- "India being in the midway through its demographic dividend is providing an economic growth in terms of the working age share of the population. Hence to exploit this dividend and meet the growing aspiration of those entering the labor force, India’s Economy needs to create enough “good jobs”- jobs that are safe and pay well, and encourage firms and workers to improve skills and productivity. It may be noted that of the 10.5 million new jobs creative between 1989 and 2010, only 3.7 million-about 35 percent – were in the formal sector. In this period total establishments were increased by 4.2 million. However jobs informal sector have come down possibly due to increased use of contract labour. Thus, the challenge of creating the good jobs of India could be seen as a challenge of creating more formal sector jobs which also guarantee workers protection." 
A2: We have long known that formal sector jobs are on average of higher quality than informal employment. Many of us have also argued that many labour policies that restrict flexibility of labor in the formal sector, including to reduce workers when there is no product demand actually end up reducing the generation of new formal sector jobs. The survey updates us on this issue.

Fiscal Deficit, Subsidies

Q3:  The survey finds that  meeting fiscal deficit  target of 3.5 per cent would be challenging due to OROP  and VII th pay commission recommendations. It suggests the time is right for a review of medium term fiscal frame work. It adds that there are new developments in, and approaches to, medium term fiscal frameworks around the world from which India can usefully learn. Your take on the issue and on whether the Budget should defer fiscal consolidation plan for another year?
A3: The formal FRBM technically expired in 2008, but has been informally maintained since then. A comprehensive review, updation and legal reiteration of the framework is overdue. In my view the first best policy would be to stick to fiscal targets for 2016-17 and reduce monetary policy (Repo ) rates by 75 BPS. As the latter is unlikely to happen given the the financial markets focus on nominal (instead of real) rates, the second best policy may be to postpone FD targets, while holding on to Revenue Deficit targets

Q4:  The survey says Rs 100,000 crore subsidies are going to the better-off merely on account of 6 commodities like gold, LPG, Kerosene, Electricity, railway fares, aviation and turbine fuel (ATF) plus the Small Savings Scheme. This represents substantial leakage from the Government’s kitty, and an opportunity foregone to help the truly deserving. Do  you agree? What reforms would you suggest?
A4: As I haven't done my own estimate, I have nothing to add to the economic survey's estimate. Some of us have been arguing for decades that subsidies should be targeted on the poor and deserving and channeled in a way that minimizes misdirection to the better off, bureaucratic expenditures & corruption. This was my reason for suggesting a UID based multi application smart card that would bring all subsidies under one roof(so to say).[i] I have also subsequently suggested allowing a mobile based cash payment system, that connects the cell number to the UID. A DBT system using bank accounts is an alternative which has been adopted and also serve the same purpose given spread of bank accounts to rural areas. JAM is an attempt to incorporate Mobiles into the system

 Q5:  The survey emphasizes that the Government budgeted Rs. 73,000 crore- about 0.5 per cent of GDP- on fertilizer subsidies in 2015-16. Nearly 70 per cent of this amount was allocated to urea, the most commonly used fertilizer, making it the largest subsidy after food. Distortions in urea are the result of multiple regulations. These distortions feed upon each other, and together create an environment that leads to a series of adverse outcomes.  Your views?
A5: I have myself served on several committees that recommended reform of the Urea production and  subsidy system. Unfortunately the vested interests are too strong to be easily disrupted. In the past, the share of the subsidy going to producers (vs farmers) has fluctuated between 100% to 0%. The current period when the prices of oil refinery products used in Urea production are low, provides a good opportunity for complete decontrol combined with targeted subsidy through bank accounts, mobiles or a Kisan credit card.

Social Security

Q6:  The survey also says introduction of DBT in LPG and MGNREGS have proved that use of JAM can considerably reduce leakages, reduce idle funds, lower corruption and improve ease of doing business with the government. Despite huge improvements in financial inclusion due to Jan Dhan, JAM Preparedness indicators suggest that there is still long way to go. Your take?
A6: The key common element is the use of the UID/Adhar number and a payment channel that is accessible to beneficiaries. The opening of bank accounts for the poor has definitely facilitated the use of bank accounts for making direct payments. I have long argued that the use of mobile accounts as a way of transferring funds would be a better channel because its reach among the poor is much deeper. However, forcing the administrators to open accounts for the poor before making payment can accelerate the spread of accounts.
Q7:  The survey says providing food security entails making food available at affordable prices at all times, without interruptions. In order to provide food security, in the current agriculture scenario, India has to focus on supplies which are timely and uninterrupted and affordable for the poor. Your views on that?
A7: I first analysed this issue in a 2002 paper & suggested a three tier approach depending on the degree of competitive availability of food supply shops.[ii] In urban areas where there competitive food supply is available, we should switch completely to some form of food credit cards. In remote or hilly areas where there may not be many suppliers we should continue with the full PDS system. In the other in between areas a combination of food stamps/food credit card and competing PDS outlets could be used.
Q8:  There are some new chapters in the Survey such  as Mother and Child. What do you think  of those?
A8: In 2007 paper on Child Nutrition I argued that Sewage, Sanitation and Public toilets were the most important cause of this problem in India.[iii]  I am therefore very happy that this problem is receiving attention.  However, I think more research needs to be done to determine what are the other critical elements of the problems and consequently the most effective solutions

Trade & Tariffs

Q9:  The survey suggests that India should resist calls to seek recourse in the protectionist measures, especially in relation to items that could undermine the competitiveness of downstream firms and industries. It also suggests that India should strengthen procedures that allow WTO-consistent and hence legitimate actions against dumping (anti-dumping), subsidization (countervailing duties), and surges in imports (safeguard measures) to be taken expeditiously and effectively. Your take?
A9: I agree completely with this suggestion with one caveat. China is a non-market economy which is exporting deflation through its State owned and Party sponsered enterprises. So in the short term (say during 2016) other temporary protective measures may be justified.
Q10  It  also  says higher tariff is coming in the way of benefits from FTAs. Do you agree?
A10: What the CEA said was that the imports of India (& its FTA partners) have increased in proportion to the reduction in tariffs resulting from the FTA. So for example India's imports from ASEAN have gone up more that than vice versa, because India with higher tariffs, reduced them more in per cent points.
---------------------------------
A version of this appeared in the Business Standard of Saturday 27th March, under the banner, "Vested Interests too strong to Reform Urea Subsidy" http://www.business-standard.com/budget/article/vested-interests-too-strong-to-reform-urea-subsidy-arvind-virmani-116022700010_1.html .


[i]  https://sites.google.com/site/chintan1997reg/institutional-reform/uid 
[ii]  Virmani, Arvind and  P. V. Rajeev, “Excess Food Stocks, PDS and Procurement Policy,” Planning Commission Working Paper No. 5/2002PC, December 2001.
[iii]https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxkcmFydmluZHZpcm1hbml8Z3g6NzlkYzBkYzRlNzJlYTQxOA

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Budget 2015-16: Some Suggestions



Introduction

    This note makes suggestions on issues that either come directly under the purview of the Ministry of Finance or are closely related to it.  These include Fiscal Deficits, Taxation, Expenditures and Subsidies and Financial Sector.  Though “Big Bang budgets”  have sometimes had policy announcements outside these areas, this is only successful if there is a great deal of confidence that the policy announcements will reach fruition & implementation. Otherwise they can do more harm than good.

Fiscal Deficit & Revenue Deficit

    The budget needs to stick to the Fiscal deficit targets (glide path for reducing FD) outlined by FM Arun Jaitly in his maiden budget, or risk losing credibility. It is equally, if not more, important however to achieve the original FRBM target of zero Revenue Deficit by 2016-7. These two together imply an improvement in the quality of central government expenditures with a shift from subsidies and current expenditures to investment-capital expenditures: In other words the reduction in revenue expenditures can provide room to increase investment in infrastructure while meeting the old fiscal deficit targets.[1]
    This will also create the confidence in the RBI to move aggressively on Repo rate reductions an easing of monetary policy to complete the “Macro Pivot” that the Indian economy desperately needs to stimulate demand for consumer durables (like automobiles, housing & home goods).[2]
   As a reduction in the revenue deficit represents an increase in public savings, this will help increase national savings and thus help slow down the rapid accumulation of foreign liabilities [increasingly negative Net international Asset (NIA) position of India] that has occurred since 2010 and minimize the probability of sudden stops in capital inflows.

New FRBM & Credit Rating

  India’s high fiscal deficit has been the major reason for its marginal credit rating (lowest investment grade: Moodys Baa3/S&P’s BBB-). Government may consider targeting a further reduction in the Fiscal deficit to zero by 2019-20 with the objective of raising India’s global credit rating. FM could announce his objective of raising India’s global rating by three notches to upper medium investment grade [Moodys A3 or S&P’s A-] over the next five years or so.  This would also need to be supported by a new FRBM with new FRBM targets to establish credibility and ensure a credit rating upgrade of this magnitude.

Tax reform

Administration, Appeal & Settlement

       What has been called “Tax Terrorism” by some and “harassment” by others, has been one of the contributors to the collapse of economic growth from 2011 to 2014. There is an urgent necessity for a dramatic overhaul of the entire system of tax administration, tax procedures and tax rules and of the review, appeal and rectification mechanisms. Based on the recommendations of previous committees on tax administration reform and the Government’s  E-Governance ideas, the FM’s budget speech could outline a credible road map for reform of the revenue administration and speeding up of the appeallate system. For instance recording of every decision of each tax officer, including those relating to tax demands, success of legal cases and years spent, would help analysis of outcomes of these decisions with a view to continuous improvement.  It is important to demonstrate quick, fair & effective tax justice for all actual & potential tax payers.

Goods & Services Tax

  The FM can spell out a road map for GST and set in motion any changes in administrative structures/systems that will be required for the GST. He could also start modifying Central Excise/ VAT/ Service tax rates to close the gap with rates that will be required under GST.

Customs Tariffs & Duties

     Inverted duty structures arise whenever selected products are allowed below the average/median rate which is currently close to the general peak tariff rate of 10%. The IT zero agreement reduced tariffs on many electronics final goods to 0% and therefore created an inverted structure in electronics. To the extent it is legally possible an effort must be made in the budget to move to a uniform 10% tariff rate by raising import tariffs that are below this rate and lowering those which are higher than this rate. This is the best structure for the “Make in India objective”
    Textiles and Agriculture are two major sectors of the economy, for which customs duty reforms lagged far behind the others. Textiles still has a complex mix of Specific and Ad valorem import tariffs that is a source of enormous corruption. This undermines/defeats any objectives that such a complex structure was designed to achieve. It would be far better to drastically simplify these rates. The ideal solution would be to eliminate specific duties and unify Ad velorem rates at 10% (which is the general peak rate). The second best solution would be a uniform rate of 15% to be reduced to 10% in a few years. The third best would be to reduce the specific rates to 2-3 at most and eliminate them in next few years.
Agriculture is the only sector subject to Ad hoc bans on import and exports. I know from experience that these bans and their removal always come too late to benefit the farmer. These Ad Hoc changes usually benefit some favored intermediary. The consumer is usually saved from the worst excesses. The farmer can only benefit if there is a stable regime of import tariffs and export duties on the basis of which he can plan future crop patterns and investments for productivity improvement. The FM could announce his intention to eschew import-export bans (in future) and announce a committee to work out a structure of import tariffs & export duties that would balance the interests of farmers and consumers. If some reports/studies exist in the Ministry he could even announce some rationalization of tariffs & duties, for instance a move to reduce tariffs on all agricultural inputs (cotton, wool, silk etc) into manufacturing to 10%.

Income Taxes

   The Income tax law and rules are a ramshackle structure built over decades with new extensions added every year.  The original version of the new Direct Taxes Code, which I saw in 2009 as CEA, came fairly close to a simplified structure based on sound economic principles. There were a few minor items which could have easily been corrected. I understand it has lost some of its economic soundness and simplicity as it went through Parliament. However, the need for a new Income Tax law and simplified rules remains.  Some effort needs to be made to simplify the income tax on the basis of the principle of reducing ‘exemptions and deductions” and reducing marginal rates to produce revenue neutral change. 
The complexity and harassment is even greater with respect to business and corporate taxation, and a good budget must show some effort at simplification, particularly with respect to cross border entities and transactions.
One uniquely Indian anti-entrepreneur tax rule introduced in the last 3 years needs to be eliminated: That is to treat issue of shares of Start-ups to funders at a price above the face value (at which they are held by the start up entrepreneur) as short term capital gains on which a tax must be paid at time of issue.

Non-Tax Revenues

  Finance Ministry must continue to pursue the change in system for leasing national assets like spectrum, minerals, and land is done through transparent, competitive auctions. In the case of spectrum, this requires removal of artificial stipulations of minimum price (price of rural spectrum in many states is zero), freedom to trade or sub-let the spectrum to other qualified bidders and to ensure open access in areas where spectrum is surplus (e.g. many rural areas)

Expenditures

    With the abolition of National Planning and the Finance Commission recommended transfer of higher share of gross taxes, the Central Government should increasingly focus on subjects in the Central list and on public goods(& service) aspects of those in the Concurrent list. The division of expenditure into Plan & non-Plan should be re-classified into the economic categories of “consumption” and “investment”. These overlap broadly with the budgetary categories of “current” & “capital” with the major exception of expenditure on maintenance and repair of capital assets(which is a form of capital formation).  A serious effort must be made in this budget to change the expenditure mix from current to capital and thus reduce the revenue deficit.

Investment Expenditures

    The Central Government must focus its limited resources on classic “Public goods infrastructure”. These are parts of infrastructure in which social benefits far exceed private benefits or from which it is difficult or impossible to collect user or service charges on a sustained basis. Highways and roads, carefully selected rail lines & related signaling equipment and critical bottlenecks in Ports and waterways are already identified focus areas on which greater budgetary emphasis is needed. However, to successfully bring in complementary or supplementary private investment in “private goods infrastructure” the policy & regulatory environment must simultaneously be made more transparent and free of policy and regulatory risks.

Consumption Expenditures

        On the consumption side the focus has to be on the subsidy and other reforms already identified by the government should be pushed along by this budget: Drastic reform of Food Corporation of India and the entire procurement-PDS system can reduce wastage & corruption and make more funds available for investment. Initial steps could also be taken for shifting all metros/urban areas (given competitive supply of food grains) from physical supply to cash subsidies for food grain purchase.  Similarly, NREGA reforms to increase capital component and pay wages directly through Aadhar linked accounts could also change the mix.
        In Education and Health, Central Government should focus on preparing and propagating E-education and E-health systems and platforms that can be used in any/every State, it should focus on educating the educators, teaching the teachers, training the trainers and managers of (public & private) education and health systems across the country. It should focus much more on “Public health” & eradication of Communicable diseases and on “Public Education,” than on personal health & education. The “Swach Bharat” and “Beti Padhao, Beti Bacha” campaigns are good examples of this approach. The Skill Development Mission, including the need for Standardization and Certification of the thousands of certifiable skills, is another initiative that requires a much greater urgency and thrust to be imparted to it.

Subsidies

   The decision of the Govt. to increasingly transfer subsidies directly to intended recipients (without distorting prices of products and services) by linking them to the UID/Aadhar number is a very good one. Government has also accepted the advice to make the (cash) transfer payments through bank accounts.  If all subsidies including kerosene to the poor & fertilizer/Urea subsidies to farmers can be given directly, it will be a signal achievement of the government. The funds saved through reduced administrative costs and elimination of corruption can be used for job creating, productivity enhancing, infrastructure development.
The Aadhar authority needs to start analyzing all its records to eliminate duplicates and identify incomplete coverage. For the latter, one way is to compare with the digitized electoral roles with Election Commission. Second way is to aggregate UID Nos issued, by blocks and compare with population records from the last census, to identify areas that need special effort.
There are two non-conventional ideas that are worth considering & adopting. First is the use of cell phone based subsidy/transfer payment systems for reaching the poorest of the poor, given that 80-90% of the population has cell phones. In fact it would probably be cheaper to give all the ultra-poor a free cell phone than to ensure that they have usable bank accounts.[3]
Second, adopt a UID linked multi-application smart card (MASC) as a single unified platform for all subsidies, welfare and social schemes. Such a card can easily have slots for the poor’s entitlement to public education and government healthcare facilities or Govt. funded credit/debit limits for use in private facilities.[4]

Financial Sector

          The rise of NPAs in Public sector Banks (due to forced lending for infrastructure projects subject to Govt policy & regulatory risk) and the imminent necessity of introducing Basel III capital adequacy norms, makes capitalization of PSBs an urgent problem. The funding required has to be raised from the market. One possible solution is to set a dual limit: 51% for SBI and a few of the strongest & most profitable PSBs and 26% for the rest. Then sell shares in the latter to capatilise all PSBs to required levels (Many years ago a committee headed by Dr. Bimal Jalan had recommended lowering the limit for Govt. shareholding in PSBs to 26%).

Conclusion

    In his speech to the ET Global summit, the PM has laid out the elements of a New Development Paradigm, of Employment Generation and Empowerment of the Poor and Middle Classes.  The forthcoming budget should flesh this out and give it a more concrete shape.[5]

-------------


[1] During 2005-2008  an argument was made that subsidies for health & education should be classified as “capital expenditures” (as “human capital”) contrary to the accepted budgetary practice all over the World. The result of this exercise was not better health & education but a large increase in consumption expenditures that helped create the 2010-11 bubble and subsequent bust in economic growth.
[5] A New Development Paradigm: Employment, Entitlement and Empowerment, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XXXVII No. 22, June 1-7, 2002, pp. 2145-2154. https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxkcmFydmluZHZpcm1hbml8Z3g6MjQ4ODc3YWI2ZDcxZmE5NQ